Huskar's place in the competitive scene

np you can copypasta that from me next time <3

The thread was started by me, what were you expecting?

The discussion so far isn't bad and IMO needs to keep going at least for our little community. Is a good read unless it derails into name-calling. It's a good idea for others to look at our conversations, especially this one. If the thread poops down to name-calling and the such then please lock the thread.



I'm guessing you mean one of my ex steam friends? How did I try and discipline him? Reread that thread again because you go further into this discussion about what's morally right or wrong. I was not there to discipline him, there was no point. I wanted him to realize how much of a **** he was being and how much of a condescending *** he was to everyone in the party. He also touted himself being very experienced when one party member (don't remember if it was one of my other steam friends) jokingly said he was so good. Why are you cherry picking information?

Here is the thread for anyone that wants to view it. Pretty sure I made my intentions clear for my post.



That is not how you "politely" end an argument, if I'm elongating it then you're the chewing gum of the post. Stop trying to put it all on me and yes, you did play victim. Reread your post. I know it feels like an attack because you're taking it personally and I've said that. You make general statements like these:




Of course I'd want to challenge that, it's so broad that on it's own it doesn't add to the topic unless you elaborate. This also doesn't mean I don't understand what you're trying to say when I ask you to go further with your discussion. Again why are you assuming I don't know nor understand what you're saying and what makes you think I don't understand that hero better than you?



You're literally going around in circles, I can ask that same question to you with where you are getting those facts from:





Ok sure he can be a Mek holder, I'm not disagreeing with you and I've said that. You're again repeating yourself like I don't understand what you're trying to say, I've made my response to it and it seems like you're just ignoring it but you then complain that I'm not "empathizing" with your opinions? Why am I repeating myself? Are you trolling again?



Of course you're not disagreeing with BKB or CG on him because you originally asked me how does CG correlate with a buffed ult. So I'm giving you my reasoning for why Crimson Guard would work for Huskar's ultimate. Here's the post where you asked that question:



Are you forgetting your own comments you make? It's like your forgot why I mentioned it in the first place and then you respond to it like that wasn't the case.




Sure, if his ult gets buffed he'll probably see a lot more play. One of the problems I had was you saying if Huskar's ult was buffed that is when Mek is viable. I've responded to that by saying regardless if his his ult is buffed or not, he'll still be a viable mek carrier... even though I'd rather have another player get it instead and have Huskar focus on other core items. Another idea to your idea, how is this hard to understand?




This here is a simple but prime example of you trying to manipulate the conversation in a direction I do not want to go. I'm here discussing and challenging your ideas but you instead feel threatened. I get your points and MULTIPLE people including responded to that idea. You keep going back to it because you think I'm not empathizing with you whereas that's not the case.



Ironic, why are you assuming I don't understand your "advisement" of the build? How arrogant and manipulative of you.



So what I'm saying is not input but your "insights" are valid. Does this confirm your arrogance? Dota is a game full of those variables that make a hero.



You've already responded saying your comments are factual opinions, right? So I'm responding to those factual opinions with my own so the difference is that I'm not imagining these circumstances and I have a much stronger understanding of the game than you. If anything add me and we'll play some games together.



I don't understand, I'm not like you nor am I even close to what you did when you came to the forums. You're again being manipulative. I know you said you're trying to separate yourself from that old image but how you talk and think from that "old kyfoid" is not that different. That person IS you, whether or not you're trolling; how you think and respond has an incredible resemblance. This thread is a VERY big example of how you think.



Ok, thanks



I did give you a chance to explain nor was I trying to stop you from expressing your points. The whole point of our discussion was to think and talk things through. The hell? I even ASKED you to explain further because your comment lacked explanation.



Have you never had your work or ideas criticized or become a center of critic? How you think translates to your work or ideas and whoever is viewing it will provide their response to it. This is a very normal thing you see in both professional and amateur works, heavily emphasized in art related majors.

There are two types of people who respond to the critics: One that takes critic professional and personally. So far, you're the latter that takes it negatively.



Ok, keep improving. That should be the only direction. Nobody here is trying stop you. So when you get to the point that you're good and have a strong understanding of the game, reread our conversation.

For those that don't want to read above

The problem I'm seeing with you Kyphoid is that you're unable to refine the thoughts of your experiences and properly think things through. So when having a discussion, you keep repeating AND argue against yourself (I have evidence in previous comments). You're also assuming other people, mainly myself that they have no understanding of what you're trying to say or do and that I'm not "empathizing" (?) with you.

You present an idea, somebody will respond to it. Nobody with the right experience should be making broad statements, where discussed further won't go far, like you did (evidence of you constantly repeating that same info) but you constantly do it throughout our conversation. However you're touting that you have an understanding but it's only to the extent of your own ignorance. You're taking my responses as an attack, whereas I'm just challenging your ideas and discussing it further. When I'm challenging ones' idea that doesn't mean I want to kill it and stop it. I've repeatedly said that on multiple occasions.




Was this not quote you so agree with? Ironic isn't it?

I agree with nubtrain.
Thats all i say.

Perhaps i now know the limits of ignorance, hopefully next thread we can have a better discussion.
Here have a quote e from me
" there are 2 kinds of ignorance. One is ill-known and the other ill-presented.

What i take away from here is that improper representation is equated with ignorance, worse, it leaves you bitter for you know what was wrong and you still couldnt convey what you meant. "

kt;dr

:)

Kt;dr = k thx didnt read? Kappa thread didn't read? Me thread didnt read?
Or somethin else?

And I'm just siting here spectating. Good thing I didn't got into this.

Wow the twist is too great my head hurt aghaglabhag

Wow this completely cheer me up. Im so pissed right now, my cat just **** all over me in my sleep (dont even laugh).

........

wat