Please verify that you are not a bot to cast your vote.
Help SupportOur Growing Community
DOTAFire is a community that lives to help every Dota 2 player take their game to the next level by having open access to all our tools and resources. Please consider supporting us by whitelisting us in your ad blocker!
Want to support DOTAFire with an ad-free experience? You can support us ad-free for less than $1 a month!
It was like mirana all over again, when she became more popular she also had a **** winrate becouse it was ******ed to have her as your hard farmer, razor has the same problem.
They were building Razor wrong if they want to farm, they kept the same aghs refresher build, instead of going for a mek + bkb build, so they can get the full drain off in a fight and wreck face. I've only seen it once happen the entire tournament, though gotta give it to RTZ, he's been adapting really well his hero to the enemies, especially Razor, I've seen hex, ghost scepter and many more from him.
I agree with you just not with all the examples.
Dendi was actually really succesfull with tiny-wisp earlier in the tournament. Burning is also fine on razor it is just that that the hero was so overpicke that he often didnt make sense at all in their strategy.
It was like mirana all over again, when she became more popular she also had a **** winrate becouse it was ******ed to have her as your hard farmer, razor has the same problem.
Dendi Tiny worked in the one game against Liquid, but they tried the same thing against Newbee, and lost mid 2v1 to Mu's TA..
I think the bottomline was that, instead of playing heroes they were suited for, they tried to play "meta" heroes even though it didn't suit their playstyle. An obvious example was Dendi - this player is known for his flashy plays and playmaking heroes (like Puck/Pudge/Ember Spirit/etc). Instead, he played a lot of heroes like Death Prophet that didn't suit his playstyle, which really limited his ability. For teams like Na'Vi that depend a lot on their mid player making plays during the mid game, this really hurt them a ton. The series against C9 emphasizes this even more. The games Dendi played Mirana and DP, they lost. The game he played Invoker, they ended up winning.
In my opinion, teams should stick to what they are strong at, and tweak their play according to the meta, rather than totally revamping their drafts/heroes to suit the meta.
Dendi Tiny worked in the one game against Liquid, but they tried the same thing against Newbee, and lost mid 2v1 to Mu's TA..
I think the bottomline was that, instead of playing heroes they were suited for, they tried to play "meta" heroes even though it didn't suit their playstyle. An obvious example was Dendi - this player is known for his flashy plays and playmaking heroes (like Puck/Pudge/Ember Spirit/etc). Instead, he played a lot of heroes like Death Prophet that didn't suit his playstyle, which really limited his ability. For teams like Na'Vi that depend a lot on their mid player making plays during the mid game, this really hurt them a ton. The series against C9 emphasizes this even more. The games Dendi played Mirana and DP, they lost. The game he played Invoker, they ended up winning.
In my opinion, teams should stick to what they are strong at, and tweak their play according to the meta, rather than totally revamping their drafts/heroes to suit the meta.
I agree with you, just not the tiny example. He was 100% with him at TI untill that TA. I believe 3-0
I feel like Newbee won Playing like Navi used to excel at. Dendi should've been "unleashed" similar to past TI's with his signature heroes. A solid farmer should've been picked other than razor for Xboct so he would've been somewhat leashed..and honestly where the hell was the Kuro Rubick? They played into a meta that favored their aggressive playstyle, yet failed utterly, unless they went for the throat with heroes they excel at (game 2 vs C9)
DK gets the same review: where were the plays? MMY and LaNm made some huge plays, Mushi didn't have the magic of last year, Iceiceice was locked into heroes he definitely was bored with the thought of, and well, sad for Burning. Just seemed the strategies weren't all there for the team. A team with game breaking players at each position should have won.
Newbee--so glad they won, "Strongfu" from last year back with a vendetta. They outplayed everyone and showed no mercy, lovely to watch that kind of team cohesion and strategy combined with the skill the team had individually. A dream Team of sorts. Awesome team.
I'm even more excited for next TI, really hope the shake ups after TI make for a great year of dota.
Step 1: Pick Bristleback
Step 2: type in all chat:"GL hf"
Step 3: solo offlane
Step 4: first blood triple kill solo vs trilane
Step 5: continue head butting keyboard
Step 6: don't care, Bristleback doesn't give a ****
Step 7: screenshot repeated: BB OP comments in all chat
Step 8: alternate games with Slark pick
DOTAFire is the place to find the perfect build guide to take your game to the next level. Learn how to play a new hero, or fine tune your favorite DotA hero’s build and strategy.
Wulfstan
<Retired Mod>
Awards Showcase
Memorable (77)
Posts: 2801
Steam: Wulfstant
View My Blog
ashwinthegrim
Notable (7)
Posts: 315
Steam: Grim
Working on a Night Stalker guide!
I made a Clockwerk guide. Check it out if you want.
http://www.dotafire.com/dota-2/guide/the-real-tony-stark-6733
Timminatorr
<Editor>
Awards Showcase
Memorable (57)
Posts: 2376
Step 2: type in all chat:"GL hf"
Step 3: solo offlane
Step 4: first blood triple kill solo vs trilane
Step 5: continue head butting keyboard
Step 6: don't care, Bristleback doesn't give a ****
Step 7: screenshot repeated: BB OP comments in all chat
Step 8: alternate games with Slark pick
sulaxrox
Notable (6)
Posts: 400
Steam: sulaxrox
Zerosaviour
Notable (8)
Posts: 467