Help Support Our Growing Community

DOTAFire is a community that lives to help every Dota 2 player take their game to the next level by having open access to all our tools and resources. Please consider supporting us by whitelisting us in your ad blocker!

Want to support DOTAFire with an ad-free experience? You can support us ad-free for less than $1 a month!

Go Ad-Free
Smitefire logo

Join the leading DOTA 2 community.
Create and share Hero Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

Doom's explanation is wrong.

Please review our General Rules & Guidelines before posting or commenting anywhere on DOTAFire.

Forum » General Discussion » Doom's explanation is wrong. 36 posts - page 4 of 4
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by CaptKnuckles » March 1, 2013 12:36pm | Report
I came back because i was bored ._.

lol wuuttt... i just got that Doom is supposed to be Satan, I thought it was saying that Satan sent Doom to fight people for him. And i did understand, you guys were proving my point with your comments and quotes (that Lucifer should have been Satan). But I afdhjretwtqonpfsdnms lol they shouldn't have this sentence in his explanation: "Lucifer brings doom to all who would stand against him.", or they should change the word doom to something else, because i thought that... I am an idiot.

also I already gave multiple examples for the thing about your "Broh" comment, you are wrong there. It is more like knowing your friend will be a druggy, but he isn't yet, and before he does anything bad, you call him "****up". Then after he ****sup you call him "Broh".

Lol can someone delete this thread please?

CaptKnuckles



Posts: 37
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Nubtrain » March 1, 2013 2:38pm | Report
You still don't get it and you didn't get the analogy. Your changing my analogy to fit your arguement. Why would you call him a ****up if he didn't do drugs yet and if you knew your friend was going to be a druggy then you're a terrible friend so I don't understand the point of that analogy at all.

You seriously do have reading comprehension problems and proved it with
"lol they shouldn't have this sentence in his explanation: "Lucifer brings doom to all who would stand against him.", or they should change the word doom to something else, because i thought that... I am an idiot." You're literally the only one I've encountered to have trouble with that sentence.

Since I'm having a bit of fun with this I'll explain it one last time

Broh(Lucifer) was successful(Archangel) but since he messed-up(defied god) he is now unsuccessful(fallen angel). Now he does drugs(doing evil things) and people(Religious people) call him ****up(Satan). People prefer to call him ****up(Satan) because that is what he's doing right now, ****ing up but his name is still Broh(Lucifer).

Edit: Btw with that analogy you gave to try and interpret my own, you answered my analogy, you would call the friend "****up"

Edit2: The whole reason why Icefrog/Valve kept the name Lucifer for Doombringer(which was his original title in DOTA1) is simple the contradiction or irony between the name Lucifer and his title Doombringer. So the name fits perfectly.

Nubtrain
<Veteran>

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (58)
Posts: 1078
Steam: Nubtrain
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by xCO2 » March 1, 2013 2:48pm | Report
Nubtrain wrote:

Broh(Lucifer) was successful(Archangel) but since he messed-up(defied god) he is now unsuccessful(fallen angel). Now he does drugs(doing evil things) and people(Religious people) call him ****up(Satan). People prefer to call him ****up(Satan) because that is what he's doing right now, ****ing up but his name is still Broh(Lucifer).


That's some deep ****...

xCO2
<Moderator>

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (72)
Posts: 1542
Steam: RUSH_and_ABUSE
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by CaptKnuckles » March 2, 2013 10:43pm | Report
I like turtles.

CaptKnuckles



Posts: 37
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by PeteDawg » March 17, 2013 11:01am | Report
This entire argument is ridiculous because they're free to refer to their characters as whatever they like, be it Satan, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Abbadon, or whatever, but for the sake of argument: perhaps they just didn't want to call him Satan for the sake of not offending people, whereas a looser reference to him would have the same idea, but with less stigma attached to the name?

PeteDawg



Posts: 1
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by xCO2 » March 17, 2013 11:13am | Report
PeteDawg wrote:

This entire argument is ridiculous because they're free to refer to their characters as whatever they like, be it Satan, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Abbadon, or whatever, but for the sake of argument: perhaps they just didn't want to call him Satan for the sake of not offending people, whereas a looser reference to him would have the same idea, but with less stigma attached to the name?


Why are you ghosting this thread? This argument has been over for weeks.

xCO2
<Moderator>

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (72)
Posts: 1542
Steam: RUSH_and_ABUSE
View My Blog

Quick Reply

Please log in or sign up to post!

DOTAFire is the place to find the perfect build guide to take your game to the next level. Learn how to play a new hero, or fine tune your favorite DotA hero’s build and strategy.

Copyright © 2019 DOTAFire | All Rights Reserved